Prevailing Wages
Basics

Prevailing wage laws require firms working under a government contract to pay the “prevailing” wage for each job, that is, at least the median or locally prevailing wage and any fringe benefits paid on similar projects in the region. Kansas passed the first prevailing wage law in 1891. It provided legal precedent for the 1931 passage of the federal Davis-Bacon Act, which established prevailing wages for federal public works jobs. The prevailing wage is different for each occupation and each city or county, and rules and regulations governing them vary by state.  Historically, prevailing wage laws have applied to public works jobs. Currently, thirty-two states and the District of Columbia have prevailing wage laws.

 

Current

Opponents in a number of states are attempting to repeal or weaken prevailing wage legislation at the state level.  These campaigns are based on the narrow and short-sighted conviction that government contracting should always go to the lowest bidder—regardless of worker compensation or workplace conditions.  Legislative initiatives include efforts to raise the threshold (the dollar value of the project) at which prevailing wage rates would apply (AK, IN), to exempt certain public entities (i.e. school boards) from their coverage (MD, MO), to erode the wage rates (IL, MD, MN), or to rescind state prevailing wage statutes entirely (AZ, LA, MI, MN, NJ).

 

FAQ

Why do we need “prevailing wage” laws?

At the heart of these laws is the conviction that government, as a major buyer in the construction sector, should not act to drive down wages. Indeed, the civic-minded reformers who initially pushed for prevailing wage laws believed that the government ought to use its buying power to enhance the welfare of workers and their families.

Don’t “prevailing wage” laws inflate government contract costs?

No.  A growing body of economic studies finds that prevailing wage regulations do not increase government contracting costs. In many settings, prevailing wage rates may be at or near what contractors would pay anyway.  Even when prevailing wage laws do “bid up” wages, there is little evidence that this is simply “passed through” as an increased cost: labor costs are only about a quarter of overall construction costs (so a 10 percent bump in wages would mean only a 2.5% bump in costs); higher wages are often offset by the higher productivity of skilled workers; and contractors my absorb the increased cost rather than pass them along.

 

Learn More

Both the AFL-CIO and the National Alliance for Fair Contracting maintain resource pages for prevailing wage research and legislative campaigns. The AFL “States of Denial” project has a nice summary of state-level attacks on prevailing wage laws.  See also the work of the Economic Policy Institute, including its 2008 survey of research on prevailing wage and contract costs.

Recent Research Highlights